“Prince Caspian” is the second installment in “The Chronicles of Narnia”, one of the “Big Three” of fantasy world (others being LoTR and Harry Potter).
Plotline: The four Pevensies kids, Peter, Susan, Edmund and Lucy, ruled Narnia for a long time before returning to England. It has been one year since they returned, and now they are just getting settled, when something pulls them back to Narnia. But this Narnia, hundreds of years later, is far different than they remember.
Conquered and ruled by Telmarines for 9 generations, this is Narnia where talking animals, dryads and nymphs exist only in stories (if at all) for common Telmarine inhabitants. And even for these “old Narnians”, Aslan and the days of Kings and Queens of Narnia are a story, even a myth. When the Lord Protector (and King-aspirant) Miraz has a son, Prince Caspian the Tenth has to run away to save his life. He stumbles across the “old Narnians”, and stands with them to gain his throne, as well as to get his new allies their rightful place in Narnia. He calls for Help by blowing the magic horn given to Queen Susan by Aslan, which brings the Pevensies back to Narnia.
Now they must unite with Caspian and call Aslan back. They must defeat the scheming Miraz, before his armies crush and finally annihilate the Narnians. But there is still a lot of treachery and dark magic in Narnia along with courage and honour.
Character-wise, like in the book, Peter and Lucy remain the same (authoritative and sweet, respectively) as their old selfs from “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe”, and Susan grows more practical, it is Edmund who has “grown” the most, having learnt quite a bit from his mistakes when he was last in Narnia. Prince Caspian seemed to me much more in command, and more mature than his book-self.
While the “informative bits” in writing make for some great jokes, book-fans will find some changes in storyline. Mainly, the meeting between Aslan and the kids is shifted in timeline, and the “final” battle is changed somewhat. But this does provide the movie with a “climax” (I have always felt that the plot of the book moved on quite level ground from start to end). Of course, the battle does conflict a bit with Aslan’s quote that “nothing happens the same way twice”, but I am sure nobody is complaining. Not to mention, the religious overtones of Narnia series (and in particular, the question of “faith” in Aslan) is handled pretty deftly.
Much more importantly, the movie is much darker, and slightly more “adult” than the book series. There are two important points which show this. (Plot points/Spoilers ahead) One, the battle of castle, which does not feature in the book, shows the cost of mistakes of war much more clearly. Secondly, being a children’s book, Peter tells Caspian that he has come “to help Caspian, and not take his place” when they first meet. But in the movie, (personally, much more realistic,) the two teenage boys of roughly the same age compete for the position of authority.
Of course, the overall handling of the movie is darker and hence more adult than the book. But this does not mean that the kids will not enjoy the commando attack by “paragliders”, or they won’t laugh at the antiques of the Pevensies, or of Master Mouse Reepicheep. I am not scaring the parents, just that you should know that we are talking more “Order of the Phoenix” than “Philosopher’s Stone”.
P.S. The movie opens with Capsian’s aunt giving birth to a son. Best luck explaining that to your kids.
Quote of The Day:
Prince Caspian: You’re not exactly what I expected.
Edmund Pevensie: Neither are you.
Subscribe to “Lazy Habits of Thinking”
Click here for more “Book-to-Movie” reviews.
I got my first copy of The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe at age 5 (And yes, I did read it as soon as I got it. I first began reading at 4 years of age, about 10 and a half years ago.) and have been a die-hard fan of all the books in The Chronicles of Narnia since. Though moviemakers could have stayed more true to the book and still have made a fantastic movie, the extra elements that they added made sense and added to the entire effect. Prince Caspian has long been my favorite book in the Chronicles, but I always felt that certain parts didn’t really make sense. For example, if I was a Pevensie, I would’ve been devestated to leave Narnia after living and ruling there for so many “years,” but in the book the children seem to adapt much too easily. Second, I never could understand how Peter, Edmund and Caspian got along so well. Wouldn’t Edmund and Peter, Peter especially, still be in “king mode” and not want someone else on “their” turf? And what about Caspian? How could he give up so much of his power so easily? Andrew Adamson and the writers of the movie also noticed these things and I’m glad they did! They added a bit of a power struggle between the boys and also showed the Pevensies in England, missing Narnia. All in all, this movie was fantastic, as was the first one. I look forward to the movie version of The Voyage of The Dawn Treader! =]
@Evelyn: I came up on Narnia quite late (sometime in last 2-3 years), but I can understand you completely.
I guess in the books, there is this whole “High King Peter of Narnia” and all kings below him kind of situation. I think that is why Peter is OK with another king, and Caspian places himself below Peter and Edmund. But I agree, the movie version is much better. So is the climax.
I am still a bit unsure about the Dawn Trader, given some “situations” (slavery and all) in it. But it is a movie on a very very large canvas, and given how they are making movies more “adult”, I think they can handle it. What do you think?
BTW, welcome to my blog (though a bit late response). Keep reading other reviews, and comments are welcome.
I see this film everyday .