The title ‘Once and Future King’ is not lightly given, and there are very few kings (or queens) in history of the world who have so permeated into the psyche of a nation.
But in Helen Hollick’s “The Kingmaking ” (first of her Pendragon’s Banner trilogy), the story of Arthur is separated from its mythical aspects of magic and chivalry.
When Uthr Pendragon is murdered, his friend and ally Lion Lord Cunedda reveals the secret of Arthur’s birth before the dispirited army, and declares him the rightful Pendragon as Uthr’s son. But before Arthur can gain his throne, political expediency demands that he serve under his father’s enemy and murderer, King Vortigern. The same forces push him into a loveless marriage with Vortigern’s Saxon daughter, Princess Winifred, and away from his Cymraes fach, Gwenhwyfar.
While Arthur is gaining allies and reputation as a cavalry commander, Vortigern’s father-in-law, Hengest is amassing his Saxon forces on British shores. The Saex “allies” of Vortigern form an insurmountable obstacle between Arthur and his two goals: the throne of Britain, and Gwenhwyfar.
King Arthur is synonymous with Chivalry, Round Table, Merlin, and most important of all, the Quest for the Holy Grail. Many of the highlights of the legend are woven seamlessly into the story here, but this book is as far away from the myth as possible. The book strips the Arthurian legend of all those layers, leaving a period of violent struggle, when Rome had abandoned British isles and Saxons and other barbarians were fighting for dominance over the roman remnants.
Arthur in this book is a the product of his time. He drowns his loveless marriage in wine and women. A ruthless warlord and a gifted general, he understands the politics of power enough to serve under Vortigern (and later, briefly with Vortigern’s son Vortimer), and to understand the threats around him in the court. He is circumspect enough to play the long game and form the foundation on which he will later build his famed elite cavalry army, the Artoriani.
At the same time, that one moment of passion which will ruin all is never far below the surface. That’s why he can see far enough to forge a bond of friendship with a man who can provide him horses for his cavalry, yet at the same time he can lust after his newly-formed ally’s wife, blind to everything else. And he has more than enough people in his life (including his wife) who are ready to push him over that edge. It is at such times, that his friends show their importance. Cunedda, Arthur’s cousin and his second-in-command Cei, and even Gwenhwyfar form that essential radar which keep Arthur from straying too far from his path.
Gwenhwyfar, the youngest sister in a household of older brothers, is a bit of “tomboy”. She pledges her unborn sons to Arthur’s service, still a girl, when her father declares Arthur as Pendragon. And though she has to go through many difficulties and personal devastation to gain it, remains true to her love for Arthur.
I can safely say that if I hadn’t survived A Song of Ice and Fire (the series has grown on me by now), I wouldn’t have found the book as readable as I did. As it is, once you get over the gory details of dark ages and absence of fantastical elements, the story is very engaging. I am looking forward to the next books in the series, though if this book is any indication, I am pretty sure I will be taking frequent breaks from reading to get over the more “historically accurate” parts.

Subscribe to “Lazy Habits of Thinking”
Check out more Historical fiction, and specifically, kind of backstory to Arthur, “The Last Legion“.

I am a sucker for all things Arthurian but I am confused by this. Arthur lusted for his friend’s wife? I have only ever read abt Lancelot lusting for Guinevere. Also, Gwenny is never portrayed as a tomboy and since Arthur’s her husband why would she separately pledge her unborn sons to his service? That’s their duty and destiny anyway… Muy confused!
As I said, this is not your standard Arthurian legend. No magic, no Merlin, no Lancelot-Gwen plot, and definitely no Christian quest for Holy Grail (Arthur is a pagan here).
To answer others, since Arthur is forced into an unhappy marriage, he does not exactly feel the need to be faithful to his first wife. Though, that changes when he marries Gwen later.
And Gwen pledges her unborn kids to Arthur when they are both kids, and tells him in the same breath that she will marry only the best.
Made some changes to the post, tell me if it makes sense now.
Ahhh got it. It seems like a significant departure, which is unusual, though of course, not bad. I guess I am so used to hating on Gwen for being the petulant, nasty, unappreciative wife she was, that the notion of a sati savitri Gwen will take some getting used to
Currently reading a fabulous Dracula novel- The Historian. I am glad I have garlic in my house :-p
Believe me, there is no Sati Savitri. Just that she loves Arthur, as he loves her. Look out for interview for more.
Ahem, I read the Historian. It is here somewhere. Tell me if you agree after you finish it.
[...] “The Kingmaking”, Helen Hollick has presented the story of Arthur Pendragon, who although a gifted general and [...]
Ooo you haz reviewed it? Good I will read your review once it is done. My friend Doc is so mean – we discuss sci fi/fantasy novels and when I mentioned this book, he was like Oh Yeah! Did the dad disappear yet? :-p I was on the 1st chapter :-p
Oh yeah. I won’t talk about it more. But you have reached till Dracula, right?
Yeah
It’s fascinating. And the weather in Chicago is contributing greatly – it’s been raining nonstop and it’s soooo foggy I can barely see beyond my arm! Perfect for some scawy stories lol.
[...] than history. Plus, there is no proof either way of Arthur’s existence. So, can we call “The Kingmaking” historical [...]
[...] 2/20 http://lazyhabits.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/the-kingmaking/ 2/21 and interview 2/27 [...]
I liked Hollick’s depiction of Arhtur: much more real-to-life than the traditional legend. Arthur definitely had moments where you disliked him, among his other good qualities. Gwenhwyfar was the same way. There were times where I questioned her, but overall, she was more like-able than Arthur.
What did you think of the antagonist characters? Did you think they were well-rounded and complex? What did you think of Winifred? Did she have any redeeming qualities in your mind?
Yes, I liked that the story has gray characters instead of black and white ones. As for Winifred, perhaps the only redeeming instances in her life were when she wanted Arthur for herself, instead of just wanting to keep him away from somebody.
Interestingly, do you see that the most of antagonists in Arthurian legend are female? I think this story gives one possible explanation for that.